Review: Nikon D5000

I have never written a camera review before but I am going to give it a shot. Why? because the Nikon D5000 really did nothing other than continue to surprise me. I am going to say that my very first camera was a Nikon D50. I will talk comparison between that camera and my current D700 which is similar to the D300 / D300s.

Feel / Body:

The Nikon D5000 is between the D50 and D90. Although closer to the D50 the but not as big as the D90 it still has a comfortable grip. If I had to choose this or my current body I would choose the D700 just for the small fact that the Dxxx series cameras actually fill my hand. The D5000 body is very solid like the D50 but has a small inlet near the finger tips to help keep a solid grip. I originally purchased an extended warranty with the D50 covering any kind of accidental damage but after several years of abuse the D50 never failed me. I dropped and slammed the D50 beyond the point a consumer DSLR should ever go. So because of this I don't judge the hard plastic body, I know Nikon makes them well.

Conclusion: I love the camera as a whole but this and (mainly) the lack of an AF motor drive would keep me from leaving my other camera at home.

Buttons / Layout:

This was truly the topic that inspired me to write a review. Every single button on this camera has the best feeling buttons I have ever pressed. Sounds lame yes but when you have used several cameras of different brands you just know quality when they are pressed. When compared to my D50 there are quite a few changes, I used the D50 for 3 years straight. The buttons on the D5000 are all upraised and firm not flat and mushy. This may just be the inner geek screaming inside but I would love for all of you to check out the camera first hand.

Menus on the Nikon are light years ahead of what the D50 had. There are really really easy modes on this guy to take beautiful images without a single brain cell. Scene modes and all sorts of options. Settings are all easily changed via the option menu while viewing the LCD.

Conclusion: I have not a single thing to complain about. All as I had wished.

Display:

The display on the D5000 is a first for Nikon. A swivel display on a DSLR? Nikon? Really? I have always thought the feature was cheesy and not worth it, I thought the same about live view. The two together though make for an amazing team. The colors on the display are exactly what I see on my computer monitor and very accurate. I love that I can fold the screen inward to protect the screen while it is not in use. The way I use the display the most is flat so I can look down on it from above while using live view.

I do this quite often because I shoot video with the camera quite often and when people walk past me they have no idea I am shooting video. I appear as if I am just looking down at my camera, they dont expect a small little screen to be between my chest and the camera. Think of all the people you would scare off with a camera w/ big lens pointing at people when it is held to your face. If people have no idea they are being recorded they act as usual which is what you want to capture.

Conclusion: Forget about the video portion, the display alone allows you to capture scenes you would have never have thought possible. Capturing people on camera unaware makes a lot better image.

Image Quality:

I don't have to get into this but as everyone knows the D300, D300s and D90 have amazing colors. I was shocked the first time I used the D300 and saw the incredible skin tones that came out of it. The D5000 has the same sensor as the others. Every time Nikon introduces a camera with the same sensor they always make the sensor / algorithms tweaked to produce overall better images. So I will expect in the right hands better images with the Nikon D5000 than the original Nikon D300.

Conclusion: I love the sensor and have since my very first D300. I don't expect anything but stunning sharp images from this camera.

ISO:

Compared to my D50 4 years ago with almost usable ISO 1600 this camera just blows it and the competition away. I have seen several very usable ISO 6400 images from this camera before any post production. Images are sharp at the higher ISOs and like all recent Nikons the noise is very film like (grain) and not chromatic like previous cameras. Noise now adds a feel and not so much of a distraction. Please check out the samples I will include of some non edited straight from the camera JPEGs at ISO 6400.

Conclusion: The camera has very clean grain like images which do not distract the viewer.

Focus:

All the images I have shot with the camera so far have all been manual focus. Why? Well the D5000 does not allow AF with older Nikon Prime lenses without AFS built into the lens. I bought the camera for video and because all video on the camera is MF I did not mind. When taking images using manual focus it is harder due to the prism not being as bright as what I am used to but completely doable as the images will show below. The 18-55 kit is a great lens and I would defend it any day (a lot of my landscapes were taken with it... SHHHH).

Conclusion: If you don't mind MF with your old lenses or do not own any this is the camera for you. Like I said I mostly shoot video with the camera so this does not matter to me.

ISO 100

ISO 100

ISO 100

ISO 3200

ISO 6400

ISO 6400

Conclusion:

I wrote this review because I want to share how much I love the camera. It is just a pleasure to use. I purchased the camera and the 18-55mm kit lens brand new on ebay for $660. I bought just to use exclusively for video, crazy? Sure but like the D50 I purchased a consumer camera to see if Photography as a hobby would catch on... guess what it did. I hope the same goes for this. If so I will surely be upgrading to some future Full Frame Nikon body with video :)

With every camera it has it's pros and cons, in the right hands this camera can produce amazing images easily confused with cameras 3-4x the price.

Pros:

  • Amazing proven sensor
  • Excellent HIGH ISO
  • AF with AFS lenses and 11 Point system is quick
  • Very quiet shutter
  • Feel of the body and buttons
  • Swivel Display

Cons:

  • MF with old screw drive Nikon lenses
  • Small prism can be hard adapting to for Pro Users
  • I always want a bigger grip, this is a consumer camera so it's size is expected.

Video: LowLife

Video: LowLife

So I have been struggling with quite a few things in life lately so it took me a lot longer than expected. I recorded this on the trolley awhile ago and have finally gotten around to editing it. I almost scrapped the project entirely a few times because I lost hope. I  just had to remember that I am not proud of the first images I ever took so it will be the same for video for quite some time. I guess this gives me a reason to grow.

All Videos are on YouTube in HD

httpvhd://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQwgLrPdAIM

I could not decide between black / white and color. So here are both.

httpvhd://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7GpHCnktlA

Video Notes:

I have nothing but empathy for those who stride to create videos, those who are create just for themselves and don't care about what other people think of their work. When it came down to it and why it took so long I was just embarrassed of this project because I smelled failure before I even started to edit. I used Final Cut Pro for everything. No editing to the actual clips besides making the clips B/W and opacity on a clip or two.

My heart goes out to those who create for themselves.

Video: Bonfire

Video: Bonfire

This is a short video I recorded while at the company bonfire. I knew I may be able to catch some fire lit faces and dark silhouettes.

All thrown together in 3 minutes so don't judge ;)

httpvhd://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3c9CchUfDM

Video Notes:

No tripod = no steady shots. I shot at quite a high iso. this wasn't for a serious project so I was just having fun and feeling out the camera.

Video: You and I...

Video: You and I...

So I have been really into this video thing lately. Ideas are flying around my head.

The night I shot this was my first night out with my camera. The very first videos captured with it. I am not a huge fan of the video itself but the overall completion of the first one being complete is so refreshing.

The reason I create is for the end product. I hope you all enjoy it. I have higher hopes for my next projects.

httpvhd://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tNKQe0LML4

Video Notes:

The wide angle shots were shot with the 18-55 vr kit lens. The images that seem to have some depth of field were shot with the amazing 50mm 1.4. All shots were shot handheld except the videos of the plane in the beginning.

I have spent about 6-8 hours on the video, this time does not include the time I spent recording downtown San Diego.

Photography Vs Videography

I recently started shooting capturing video and I started learning the workflow. I want explain how much more difficult it is through my eyes. I know Final Cut Pro enough to get the job done, not as good as I know Aperture but well enough.

Capturing / Shooting: Photo Win

I do photography / shoot with a Nikon D700, one of the better cameras on the market. I can take an image pretty much any time day or night and take a sharp image. Capturing video on the other hand is so very different. For example at night I need to have at least a tripod. Along with the tripod I would need steady robot hands for manual focusing and tent to hide the camera in to prevent wobble. Video of course is captured at 24p which at the same settings as a still camera would come out much darker.

Uploading / Processing / Choosing: Photo Win

When done shooting / capturing comes the time to upload and figure out what to keep. With Photo I upload to Aperture, wait for images to process and then star all of my favorite images. For video capture I have to upload all of the videos into either iMovie 09 or Final Cut Pro. With iMovie you have to wait for thumbnails to render. The biggest pain with video is compared to photos where you just "star" the image to set up for editing you have several more steps for video. These steps include finding the video clip you want, marking the in and out points and then drag the clip into the timeline. All of which is harder then simply marking an image with a star.

Editing: Photo Win

So with photos you have the same amount of possible editing you have with video. So for example you still have to do contrast / saturation / sharpness etc to each individual clip. Photos can take a lot of changes without pixelation due to the size of each photo is much larger than an individual frame from video. Not only larger in resolution but also in data size. So you cannot apply as much editing as you may want to video. So both photo and video seem to be about the same amount of work as far as color and edits until you start arranging videos on the timeline. If you want to match movies to music you have to size the files up / rearrange / speed up the clips to fit correctly. This seems simple but if you want to movie to flow correctly / want people to actually finish the movie it is a lot of work.

Exporting: Photo Win

For photos you typically export to .jpg in which is widely compatible with everything on the web for upload or printing. For video you have so many options from codecs to frame rates. A lot of times you will upload a HD video but the site / host will not recognize it as HD because it did not have the correct output settings. Seems like the difficulty of everything you do is magnified with video, almost like they do not want you to succeed.

End Result: Photo Win

Imagine a stunning photo framed in a gallery hung with proper lighting. Sounds really impressive right? Now picture what you get for video, now keep in mind you are not shooting for Fox studios or a big company, a lot of videography today is all done for the web. You could invite over friends for a viewing on your HD tv but is that really comparable to the hung image in a gallery? No, No, not at all.

Conclusion:

I feel for videographers now that I understand more of what they do. The videos they create are way under appreciated, seriously this is some time consuming stuff. I am going to be uploading a very mediocre video titled "You and I", this took me several hours and I will get no appreciation. Why? Well for 1 it is not that great and 2 no one knows how much time goes into capturing / editing etc video.

When DSLRs first started shipping with video I was scared for videographers. Since the cost of DSLRs has become cheaper a lot of people bought them and swamped the photo market offering free services to gain experience and trust me because I was one of those people. I now only shoot for myself and projects I want to do but also for free. Back on topic since these DSLRs can do amazing video with full control over DOF I thought people will try to dip into videography just for the simple fact that they can.

What do these photographers need to get started? If they are serious they will need more expensive software than what they are using now with photography. Since all the photography apps have nothing to do with video all new apps will be needed to work with the video professionally. On top of the software the computer needs to be able to handle a lot of HD video in some cases will lead to a brand new computer.

My original theory that professional videographers should be scared is being less and less an issue. I have lived the life of a videographer and I don't think it is for the masses.

Side note / Sad note:

This is the most I have written in a single anything for over 5 years. Don't judge me.

-Peter